Q
Problem solve Get help with specific problems with your technologies, process and projects.

Structural authorizations vs. role-based

I have been working with authorizations for a couple of years now, but I don't have any experience with structural authorizations. Can you explain to me the difference between structural authorizations and the linking of roles to an organizational unit within the HR organizational structure (via the PFCG)? In other words can structural authorization stand alone? I know the user can be linked to a kind of profile (via HR-customizing-str.autho), but does this mean he/she doesn't need to have a role assigned (in SU01)?
Structural authorizations are about views of the organization. They most certainly cannot stand alone, but rather allow more flexibility in how roles are assigned. For example, an HR administrator role could be assigned to several plant HR people. It is unlikely that you want people at plant A to be able to see information for plant B or vice versa. You can do this with role based authorizations, but it is much more difficult to maintain.
This was last published in October 2004

Dig Deeper on SAP HR management

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Start the conversation

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchManufacturingERP

SearchOracle

SearchDataManagement

SearchAWS

SearchBusinessAnalytics

SearchCRM

SearchContentManagement

SearchFinancialApplications

Close