Comment: Hidden problems with SUIM

Comment: Hidden problems with SUIM

I'm not asking a question... I'm sending a comment! I hope you accept this?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    When you register, you will start receiving targeted emails from my award-winning team of editorial writers. Our goal is to keep you informed on the hottest topics and biggest challenges faced by SAP professionals today.

    Hannah Smalltree, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchSAP.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchSAP.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.


Your idea of just inserting a Transaction into the Profile's S-Tcode is great and we have been using it, actually frequently. However, there is a hidden problem occurring. I'll explain in point form: Edit single role. Edit Profile and enter the transaction, just like you said. If the single role is part of a few composite roles and you do NOT re-read each composite role...in SUIM you don't get displayed all roles with the profile's transaction - this brings unreal results. At the moment I'm writing a program to access all composite roles through the profile instead of single roles.

Try it! Just create a couple of composite roles using the one single role. Then go to the single roles' Profile and add a new TC, generate. Go to SUIM and inquire on the S-Tcode and in input values request your entered tc.


You are absolutely right. But, to be honest... This is nothing new, SUIM has been inconsistent since 3.1G. I wouldn't bother with the program; I would put an OSS note into SAP. They generally are pretty good about fixing these types of glitches. Good to hear from you again.


This was first published in March 2002